Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Hume's guillotine establishes that no set of purely descriptive 'is' statements can logically entail a normative 'ought' statement without a suppressed normative premise.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Descriptive facts about human flourishing, pain, or well-being may intrinsically carry normative force without requiring separate normative premises—the facts themselves matter.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The is-ought distinction assumes normative and descriptive statements occupy separate logical categories, but this categorical separation itself is philosophically controversial and unproven.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Hume's principle confuses psychological persuasiveness with logical entailment; our difficulty seeing the connection doesn't prove a logical gap actually exists.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Logical entailment requires that a conclusion's truth-conditions are already contained in premises. Normative and descriptive statements have fundamentally different truth-conditions.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.We can coherently conceive of any descriptive state of affairs existing while an opposite normative conclusion holds. This logical possibility proves they're not entailed.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Every valid argument deriving 'ought' from 'is' in practice smuggles in hidden normative commitments when scrutinized carefully, confirming the gap.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42