Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Hume's restriction of reason to a servant of passion pres... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Probable reasoning alone cannot motivate action; it only assists in pursuing ends already held.

    Hume's restriction of reason to a servant of passion presupposes a sharp faculty distinction that Kant's critical philosophy systematically dismantles.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Kant's transcendental idealism shows reason actively structures experience through categories, not passively serving given desires.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Kant's moral philosophy grounds obligation in reason itself (categorical imperative), rejecting Hume's reduction to passion-derived sentiment.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Kant integrates sensibility, understanding, and reason as interdependent faculties, dissolving the sharp Humean separation Hume presupposes.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Hume's distinction between reason and passion targets different functions (inference vs. motivation), not necessarily separable faculties.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Kant himself distinguishes pure and practical reason, suggesting faculty divisions persist in critical philosophy despite their integration.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The claim conflates Hume's conceptual hierarchy with a faculty dualism; Hume need not require metaphysically distinct mental substances.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Virtue Ethics1 linkedMoral Responsibility1 linked

    Related

    Hume's distinction between reason and passion targets different functions (infer...Kant himself distinguishes pure and practical reason, suggesting faculty divisio...Kant integrates sensibility, understanding, and reason as interdependent faculti...Kant's moral philosophy grounds obligation in reason itself (categorical imperat...
    +3 moreShow less
    Kant's transcendental idealism shows reason actively structures experience throu...Probable reasoning alone cannot motivate action; it only assists in pursuing end...The claim conflates Hume's conceptual hierarchy with a faculty dualism; Hume nee...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit