Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Humean Best Systems accounts (Lewis, Loewer) ground objective chance in patterns across the mosaic without requiring repeated trials or physical mechanisms.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Optimality criteria for 'best systems' (simplicity vs. informativeness) are theory-laden; different weightings yield different chance values.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Chance appears fundamentally about physical propensities and generative capacities; pattern-fitting descriptions seem epistemically derivative, not metaphysically fundamental.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
The approach struggles with systems where multiple equally-optimal descriptions assign different probabilities to identical physical situations.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Objective chance requires grounding in the actual world; Best Systems avoids fictitious infinite trials or unobserved mechanisms.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Systems that maximize simplicity and informativeness capture genuine patterns; chance emerges naturally from these optimal descriptions.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
This account explains why chance guides rational credence without positing hidden causal machinery beyond the complete physical mosaic.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.