Hurka's canonical account of perfectionism requires that human good consists in developing nature-grounded excellences, a framework Stirner explicitly dismantles by rejecting 'human nature' as an abstraction.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

1 reason for

1 reason against

Reasons For

1 perspective

Reason for

1 perspective

Reason against

Based on where you are in your exploration

Canonical account(describing Hurka's most influential version of perfectionism): The standard, most widely accepted version of a theory—basically the 'textbook' explanation that most people refer to.
Dismantles(describing what Stirner does to Hurka's theory): Takes apart or destroys an argument by showing its flaws or proving it wrong piece by piece.
Hurka(as the philosopher whose theory is being discussed): Thomas Hurka is a contemporary philosopher who developed an influential modern version of perfectionism—the idea that human flourishing comes from developing our natural talents and abilities.
Nature-grounded excellences(as the kind of good that Hurka's perfectionism is based on): Skills and qualities that are considered excellent because they develop what is natural or inherent to human beings, like reason, creativity, or physical capability.
Perfectionism: The view that each person has unique capacities whose development confers value on that person's life, grounding the diversity of rational ways of living
Stirner(history of philosophy): Max Stirner (1806-1856) was a German philosopher who argued that individuals should prioritize their own interests and reject social constraints, emphasizing radical personal freedom and self-interest.
abstraction(Godfrey, Quodlibet V, q. 10): The process by which the agent intellect draws out potentially intelligible content from phantasms, making that content available to the possible intellect

1 topic