Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Husserl's account of Evidenz in Logical Investigations demonstrates that immediate judgment carries its own form of objective self-givenness, not merely a psychological accompaniment to propositional grasping.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Husserl's account conflates the felt quality of conviction with genuine objectivity; phenomenological description cannot establish mind-independent givenness.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The distinction between Evidenz and psychological accompaniment remains unclear in LU and risks reintroducing precisely the kind of unmediatable givenness Husserl elsewhere rejects.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Husserl distinguishes Evidenz from mere conviction by grounding it in the self-presentation of objects themselves, not subjective psychological states.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Immediate intuitive judgment in LU exhibits a peculiar modal character—certainty about what is given—that exceeds what psychological accompaniment alone could explain.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The noematic structure of Evidenz involves the object as present-to-consciousness in a way that makes objectivity intrinsic to the evidential experience itself.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.