Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    If a does not raise the probability of b, then a cannot c... — Carmelics
    Home/Causation
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Causal loops are impossible under Mellor's probabilistic account of causation.

    If a does not raise the probability of b, then a cannot causally affect b under Mellor's definition.

    Causation
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Causation

    Connections

    1 topic

    Modality & Possibility3 linked

    Related

    Causal loops are impossible under Mellor's probabilistic account of causation.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Causation
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    If no event in a causal loop can affect the next event, causal loops cannot obta...
    In the four-chain distribution of tokens (G-chains and H-chains), the number of ...
    Mellor defines a causal relation between singular events a and b as a situation ...
    +1 moreShow less
    When the number of chains combining b with a equals those not combining b with a...

    Similar

    When the occurrence of a or not-a happens under exactly the same circu...79%Therefore A is not causally independent of B.78%Mellor defines a causal relation between singular events a and b as a ...78%When the number of chains combining b with a equals those not combinin...77%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: causation-backwards
    View source passageHide passage
    The first two sequences may be called G-chains and the other two H-chains. Moreover, Mellor assumes that all tokens of \(A, B\) and \(C\) are distributed among the four chains so that the number of chains is exactly the same, namely one fourth of the sequences. Mellor then defines a causal relation between two singular events \(a\) and \(b\) in terms of a situation \(k\) which makes \(b\) more likely to occur given \(a\) than without \(a\), i.e., \(\rP(b\mid a) \gt \rP(b\mid {\sim}a)\). But we c

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective