Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    If a subject has entitlement for Q8 and learns the percep... — Carmelics
    Home/Perception
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Moore's proof being non-transmissive is compatible with the claim that a subject does acquire justification for the perceptual premise by undergoing the relevant perceptual experience.

    If a subject has entitlement for Q8 and learns the perceptual evidence, the subject does acquire justification for the perceptual premise.

    PerceptionTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    PerceptionTruth & Knowledge

    Connections

    1 topic

    Skepticism2 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Perception
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Moore's proof being non-transmissive is compatible with the claim that a subject...Non-transmission means justification cannot be transmitted through the argument ...Wright holds that subjects possess a special non-evidential justification called...

    Similar

    Q8 is part of the collateral information a subject needs independent j...84%Wright holds that subjects possess a special non-evidential justificat...80%Dogmatism holds that if it seems to a subject that P, the subject ther...80%Convertibility aligns with the scientific task of demonstrating per se...79%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: transmission-justification-warrant
    View source passageHide passage
    According to Wright there exist cornerstone propositions—or simply cornerstones—for different areas of discourse. In accordance with Wright’s characterization of it, c is a cornerstone for an area of discourse d just in case for any proposition p belonging to d, p could not be justified for any subject s if s had no independent justification for accepting c (see mostly Wright 2004).[10] Cornerstones for the area of discourse about perceivable things are for instance the logical negations of sk

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective