Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Moore's proof being non-transmissive is compatible with t... — Carmelics
    Home/Perception
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Moore's proof being non-transmissive is compatible with the claim that a subject does acquire justification for the perceptual premise by undergoing the relevant perceptual experience.

    PerceptionTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    0 reasons against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Non-transmission means justification cannot be transmitted through the argument to the conclusion, not that the premises lack justification.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Wright holds that subjects possess a special non-evidential justification called entitlement for accepting cornerstones such as Q8.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.If a subject has entitlement for Q8 and learns the perceptual evidence, the subject does acquire justification for the perceptual premise.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    PerceptionTruth & Knowledge

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Perception
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    Key Terms

    Moore's proof(as used in epistemology and metaphysics)
    A famous argument by philosopher G.E. Moore where he held up his hand and said 'Here is a hand' as proof that the external world (physical objects outside our minds) actually exists.
    Perceptual premise(epistemology)
    A basic claim or starting point in an argument that comes from what you directly see, hear, or sense. For example, 'I see a hand' would be a perceptual premise.
    justification(Third condition of the tripartite account of knowledge)
    The condition on a knower's belief that excludes mere luck — the belief must be held in a way that is appropriate or warranted, not merely accidentally correct.
    non-transmissive(Applied to Zebra* and the disjunctive template)
    A structure or template is non-transmissive of first-time justification when conditions for acquiring first-time justification for a conclusion cannot all be satisfied when that structure is instantiated.
    perceptual experience(as used in epistemology)
    The direct sensory experiences you have when you see, hear, touch, taste, or smell something—what the world seems like to you right now.

    Connections

    1 topic

    Skepticism2 linked

    Related

    If a subject has entitlement for Q8 and learns the perceptual evidence, the subj...Non-transmission means justification cannot be transmitted through the argument ...Wright holds that subjects possess a special non-evidential justification called...

    Similar

    Moore's proof is non-transmissive because Q8 (the proposition that an ...92%Soccer is non-transmissive of the justification depending on E684%An argument is non-transmissive when the subject's doubt about the con...82%The property of being a transmissive argument does not coincide with t...80%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: transmission-justification-warrant
    View source passageHide passage
    According to Wright there exist cornerstone propositions—or simply cornerstones—for different areas of discourse. In accordance with Wright’s characterization of it, c is a cornerstone for an area of discourse d just in case for any proposition p belonging to d, p could not be justified for any subject s if s had no independent justification for accepting c (see mostly Wright 2004).[10] Cornerstones for the area of discourse about perceivable things are for instance the logical negations of sk
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    1 (1 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit