If Albert's position evolved across his corpus, attributing a single fixed view to him that conflicts with Aquinas commits the fallacy of ignoring diachronic development in a thinker's work.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

Albert(as a historical philosopher being discussed): This refers to Albert the Great (or Albertus Magnus), a medieval philosopher and theologian from the 1200s who wrote extensively on logic, science, and theology.
Aquinas: Thomas Aquinas was a medieval Italian priest and philosopher (1225-1274) who became one of the most influential thinkers in Western history. He attempted to show that Christian faith and human reason are compatible, arguing that we can use logic and observation to understand God and the natural world. His ideas deeply shaped Catholic theology and continue to influence how religious and secular institutions think about ethics, knowledge, and the relationship between science and belief.
corpus(Distinguished from preliminary, inconclusive, or suspicion-generating findings that have not yet achieved full scientific proof): The established body of accepted scientific knowledge that meets the threshold for scientific proof and serves as the basis for standard evidence-based policy-making.
diachronic development(referring to how Albert's views may have shifted throughout his career)

Based on where you are in your exploration