Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    If an agent assigns 50% credence to the proposition that ... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Modality & Possibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Countable additivity is not a requirement of rationality

    If an agent assigns 50% credence to the proposition that not all ravens ever observed are black, countable additivity entails that the agent must be nearly certain the first non-black raven appears within some finite initial segment of observations

    Modality & PossibilityTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Modality & PossibilityTruth & Knowledge

    Key Terms

    Countable Additivity(Contested axiom in Bayesian epistemology and formal epistemology)
    A principle in probability theory stating that the probability of a countably infinite union of mutually exclusive events equals the sum of their individual probabilities
    agent(Economics terminology applied to medical ethics)
    The party in a principal-agent relationship who is instructed to produce the good or service on the principal's behalf — in the medical context, the doctor

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Modality & Possibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    credence(Bayesian epistemology)
    A subjective degree of belief, used in Bayesian epistemology to represent how strongly an agent believes a proposition.
    entails(describes a logical relationship between statements)
    Logically forces or guarantees; if A entails B, then whenever A is true, B must also be true.
    finite initial segment(mathematics and logic)
    A limited, countable starting portion of something longer (like the first 1,000 observations out of potentially infinite observations).
    proposition(Used in the context of a semantic theory sensitive to differences in subject matter.)
    The content expressed by a sentence, individuated at least in part by the subject matter of the sentence and the contents of its subsentential expressions.
    the raven problem(epistemology and inductive reasoning)
    A famous puzzle in philosophy about whether observing non-black things (like white shoes) gives evidence that all ravens are black—it seems illogical but probability theory suggests it does.

    Connections

    1 topic

    Moral Responsibility3 linked

    Related

    A probability axiom that forces such opinions is not a requirement of rationalit...Countable additivity is not a requirement of rationalityIt is not a requirement of rationality that an agent must be opinionated about w...

    Similar

    It is not a requirement of rationality that an agent must be opinionat...81%If an agent believes φ then the agent knows that the agent believes φ70%What an agent is able to do depends on which set of facts the ability ...70%Metaphysical possibility is a necessary but not sufficient condition f...70%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: formal-belief
    View source passageHide passage
    Countable additivity is not as innocent as it looks: it rules out the possibility that any agent is indifferent over a countably infinite set of mutully exclusive possibilities. De Finetti (1970, 1972) famously argued that we ought to reject countable additivity since it is conceivable that God could pick out a natural number “at random” and with equal (zero) probability. For another example, suppose you assign 50% credence to the proposition \(\neg B\) that not all ravens that will ever be obse

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective