Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that If animalism is true, any scenario allowing earlier organismic existence ipso facto allows earlier personal existence, undermining Kaufman's asymmetry.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Animalism can distinguish between 'organism existence' and 'organism-as-person existence' through functional or psychological thresholds.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Kaufman's asymmetry might rest on capacities (rationality, self-awareness) that emerge later than mere biological continuity begins.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Early developmental organisms lack the integrated cognitive architecture required for personhood even if the biological entity persists.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Animalism identifies persons with biological organisms, so organism identity conditions determine person identity conditions.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If an organism exists at time T, the same organism (by continuity) exists at earlier stages of development without personal identity gaps.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Kaufman's asymmetry requires personal identity to come apart from organismic identity, but animalism logically forbids this divergence.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.