If common-sense conceivability sufficed for genuine Cartesian possibility, the deceiving-God hypothesis would be genuinely possible, yet Descartes treats its eventual impossibility as a metaphysical, not merely conceptual, result.
?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.
Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.
Descartes' thought experiment where he imagines a powerful God could be tricking him about everything he perceives, even basic facts about the world.
Descartes
# Descartes
René Descartes was a French philosopher and mathematician from the 1600s who fundamentally changed how people think about knowledge and the mind. He's famous for the idea "I think, therefore I am" (cogito ergo sum), which means that the very fact that you can think proves you exist—a foundation for modern philosophy. He also invented the coordinate system used in mathematics (the x and y axes on a graph), which connects geometry and algebra in practical ways we still use today.
Genuine possibility(distinguishes between what's logically consistent and what could truly occur)
Something that could actually happen or be real in the world, not just something that sounds like it doesn't contradict itself.
metaphysical(Ayer's Logical Positivist usage)
Language that purports to refer beyond the physical world and lacks empirical consequences, which Ayer classifies as not literally significant