Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    If common-sense conceivability sufficed for genuine Carte... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→The common-sense concept of 'possible' (whatever does not conflict with human concepts) cannot be Descartes' view of genuine possibility.

    If common-sense conceivability sufficed for genuine Cartesian possibility, the deceiving-God hypothesis would be genuinely possible, yet Descartes treats its eventual impossibility as a metaphysical, not merely conceptual, result.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Cartesian
    # Cartesian "Cartesian" refers to a system of organizing space using perpendicular lines or axes (usually labeled x, y, and z) that intersect at a point called the origin, allowing you to pinpoint any location using numbers called coordinates. The term comes from René Descartes, a 17th-century French philosopher and mathematician who developed this method as a way to bridge geometry and algebra. You use it every day without thinking about it—GPS coordinates, video game graphics, and even spreadsheet cells all rely on this Cartesian coordinate system.
    Common-sense conceivability(the starting point being evaluated in the statement)
    Whether something can be imagined or thought about without logical contradiction in everyday thinking—basically, if you can picture it in your mind, it seems possible.
    Conceptual(describing the realm of pure thought and reason)
    Related to ideas, thoughts, and abstract concepts rather than concrete, physical reality.
    Deceiving-God hypothesis(the specific example used in the statement)

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    Descartes' thought experiment where he imagines a powerful God could be tricking him about everything he perceives, even basic facts about the world.
    Descartes
    # Descartes René Descartes was a French philosopher and mathematician from the 1600s who fundamentally changed how people think about knowledge and the mind. He's famous for the idea "I think, therefore I am" (cogito ergo sum), which means that the very fact that you can think proves you exist—a foundation for modern philosophy. He also invented the coordinate system used in mathematics (the x and y axes on a graph), which connects geometry and algebra in practical ways we still use today.
    Genuine possibility(distinguishes between what's logically consistent and what could truly occur)
    Something that could actually happen or be real in the world, not just something that sounds like it doesn't contradict itself.
    metaphysical(Ayer's Logical Positivist usage)
    Language that purports to refer beyond the physical world and lacks empirical consequences, which Ayer classifies as not literally significant

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge1 linkedModality & Possibility1 linked

    Related

    The common-sense concept of 'possible' (whatever does not conflict with human co...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective