Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    If consciousness does not arise from an external object, ... — Carmelics
    Home/Perception
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The Yogācāra idealist thesis is logically untenable.

    If consciousness does not arise from an external object, the determination of place and time cannot be logically accounted for.

    Consciousness & MindPerception
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    PerceptionConsciousness & Mind

    Related

    If consciousness does not arise from an external object, the indetermination (no...If consciousness does not arise from an external object, the performance of spec...The Yogācāra idealist thesis is logically untenable.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Perception
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    Similar

    If consciousness does not arise from an external object, the performan...90%If consciousness does not arise from an external object, the indetermi...90%If consciousness can apprehend non-existing entities, then consciousne...86%When consciousness has no objects to illumine, no intentional experien...83%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: twotruths-india
    View source passageHide passage
    The core argument in support of the only mind thesis is the impossibility of the existence of external objects. Vasubandhu develops this argument in his Viṃ 1–27 as does Dignāga in his Examination of the Intentional Object (Ālambanaparīkṣāvṛtti, ĀPV 1–8, Tshad ma ce 86a–87b) against the atomists (Naiyāyikas-Vaiśeṣika and Ābhidharmikas[8]). Against the Yogācāra idealist thesis the realist opponents, as Vasubandhu observes, raise three objections:—“If consciousness (does) not (arise) out from an

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective