Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    If consciousness can apprehend non-existing entities, the... — Carmelics
    Home/Perception
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Consciousness must have ontological priority over external objects

    If consciousness can apprehend non-existing entities, then consciousness does not require external objects as its basis

    Consciousness & MindPerception
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    PerceptionConsciousness & Mind

    Related

    Consciousness must have ontological priority over external objectsNon-existing entities can be consciously apprehended

    Similar

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Perception
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    If consciousness does not arise from an external object, the indetermi...89%If consciousness does not arise from an external object, the performan...87%If consciousness does not arise from an external object, the determina...86%Subjective consciousness alone cannot serve as the ultimate ground of ...85%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: mind-indian-buddhism
    View source passageHide passage
    In the Twenty Verses, Vasubandhu offers an elaborate defense of idealism. His arguments may be summarized as follows: Because non-existing entities can be consciously apprehended, consciousness must have ontological priority (VVS I, 1). The typical realist objection to an assertion of this sort concerns the causal function of perception: indeed, if mental content can be said to consciously arise without any reference to external objects, then why does it arise at a specific time and place and no

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective