Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    If essence and existence were identical, the existence of... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Essence and existence do not enter into real composition with one another, and to the extent that something enjoys essential being, to that same degree it enjoys actual existence.

    If essence and existence were identical, the existence of any essence would be analytically necessary, collapsing the distinction between contingent and necessary beings.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Contingency requires that a being's existence be logically separable from its nature, which presupposes essence and existence are distinct.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If essence entailed existence analytically, all conceivable essences would automatically exist, making non-existence logically impossible.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The explanatory gap between 'what something is' and 'that it is' reflects a real metaphysical distinction requiring external causation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.The essence/existence distinction may be a conceptual tool rather than a metaphysical fact, useful without corresponding to reality.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Necessity and contingency could be modal properties of propositions, not dependent on whether essence and existence metaphysically differ.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Some necessary beings (like God in classical theism) have unified essence-existence without collapsing the contingent/necessary distinction.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    1 topic

    Divine Attributes1 linked

    Related

    Contingency requires that a being's existence be logically separable from its na...Essence and existence do not enter into real composition with one another, and t...If essence entailed existence analytically, all conceivable essences would autom...Necessity and contingency could be modal properties of propositions, not depende...
    +3 moreShow less
    Some necessary beings (like God in classical theism) have unified essence-existe...The essence/existence distinction may be a conceptual tool rather than a metaphy...The explanatory gap between 'what something is' and 'that it is' reflects a real...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit