Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    If even the paradigm case of agent-based virtue ethics co... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→A theory counts as an agent-based form of virtue ethics only if the normative properties of motivations and dispositions cannot be explained in terms of something more fundamental (such as eudaimonia or states of affairs).

    If even the paradigm case of agent-based virtue ethics covertly appeals to welfare facts, the proposed irreducibility criterion excludes the very theories it was designed to classify.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Agent-based virtue ethics treats flourishing as foundational, yet flourishing is analyzable in terms of well-being outcomes.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If the criterion's target theories all invoke welfare facts, the criterion fails to distinguish virtue ethics from consequentialism.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.A classification system that excludes its intended members is self-refuting and should be abandoned or revised.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Mentioning welfare facts doesn't entail reducing virtue to welfare; peripheral appeals differ from foundational commitment.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The criterion may target only theories claiming *irreducibility*, not those actually using welfare concepts as explanatory bedrock.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Covert appeals could indicate conceptual confusion in specific theorists rather than a flaw in the irreducibility criterion itself.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Key Terms

    Covertly appeals to(describing hidden logical dependencies in an argument)
    Secretly relies on or sneaks in a concept without openly admitting it.
    Irreducibility criterion(as a philosophical measure being evaluated)
    A standard or test used to determine whether something cannot be broken down into simpler parts or explained by something else.
    Virtue ethics(in philosophy)
    An approach to ethics focused on developing good character traits (virtues like courage or honesty) rather than following rules or calculating outcomes.
    Welfare facts(as opposed to information about character or virtue)
    Factual information about well-being, happiness, or how good someone's life is going.
    agent-based virtue ethics(Distinguished from other virtue ethical theories that ground normative properties in outcomes or flourishing)
    A form of virtue ethics in which the normative properties of motivations and dispositions are not explained by reference to anything more fundamental (e.g., eudaimonia or states of affairs); what one should do is explained solely by reference to the motivational and dispositional states of agents.
    paradigm case(Used to contrast with non-paradigm cases where the relationship between explanatory power and informativeness is unclear)
    A case in which the claim that a more explanatory theory has more ways of being false is obvious or uncontroversial

    Connections

    1 topic

    Virtue Ethics1 linked

    Related

    A classification system that excludes its intended members is self-refuting and ...A theory counts as an agent-based form of virtue ethics only if the normative pr...Agent-based virtue ethics treats flourishing as foundational, yet flourishing is...Covert appeals could indicate conceptual confusion in specific theorists rather ...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit
    +3 moreShow less
    If the criterion's target theories all invoke welfare facts, the criterion fails...Mentioning welfare facts doesn't entail reducing virtue to welfare; peripheral a...The criterion may target only theories claiming *irreducibility*, not those actu...