Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    If foundational legal documents like constitutions are in... — Carmelics
    Home/Democracy & Governance
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The law is not coherently designed to serve a unified social purpose, and instrumentalism about law should be rejected.

    If foundational legal documents like constitutions are incoherent, the claim that law is coherently designed cannot be sustained.

    Democracy & GovernanceSocial Contract
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Democracy & GovernanceSocial Contract

    Connections

    1 topic

    Justice & Punishment1 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Democracy & Governance
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Constitutions are drafted by agents with political and economic interests they s...The US Constitution's compromises over slavery, when viewed against its democrat...The law is not coherently designed to serve a unified social purpose, and instru...When self-interested agents design basic social, economic, and political institu...

    Similar

    The UK constitution demonstrates that constitutions can exist without ...79%The law is not coherently designed to serve a unified social purpose, ...74%The logic that explains incoherence in legislative behavior applies eq...74%Such universal principles are indifferent regarding the specific form ...73%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: legal-econanalysis
    View source passageHide passage
    Radical political economists reject this reasoning. They carry the logic of the argument about the incoherence of legislative behavior through to the level of institutional and constitutional design. Constitutions are drafted by agents with political and economic interests that they seek to forward when they create the basic social, economic, and political institutions of the society. Incoherence may thus infect these institutions as well. The compromises over slavery in the US Constitution, for

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective