Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that If God can actualize worlds where all freely choose salvation, eternal separation is not a constraint of freedom but a failure of divine creative intention.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Free choice to reject salvation may be metaphysically incompatible with guaranteed universal acceptance, even for omnipotent beings.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Respecting libertarian freedom requires allowing agents to actualize rejection-worlds, which God cannot prevent without removing freedom.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Creative intention might include valuing the reality of human autonomy over optimizing outcomes, making separation a feature, not failure.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Omnipotent beings can actualize any logically possible world, including those where free agents consistently choose good.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If eternal separation is avoidable through divine action, allowing it suggests prioritizing something over universal salvation.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
A morally perfect creator would not permit preventable damnation when alternative worlds exist.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42