Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that If God is conceived in a purely metaphysical way with no connection to significant power, knowledge, and goodness, then the problem of evil is irrelevant to that conception of God.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    2 perspectives
    Reason for 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Purely metaphysical conceptions of God, such as Spinoza's Deus sive Natura or Tillich's 'Ground of Being,' still generate evaluative problems when creation contains suffering disproportionate to any coherent metaphysical principle.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.A God identified with Being-itself or ultimate reality cannot be fully insulated from normative assessment, since existence-conferring relations carry implicit axiological commitments that evil disrupts.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason for 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.The distinction between 'metaphysical' and 'morally robust' conceptions of God is historically unstable, as even neo-Platonic traditions like Plotinus tie the One's productive overflow to goodness, making evil a deviation requiring explanation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If a purely metaphysical God is entirely disconnected from power, knowledge, and goodness, the resulting concept is functionally indistinguishable from atheism, rendering the original claim trivially true but philosophically uninteresting.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.The problem of evil arises only when God is understood as possessing significant power, knowledge, and goodness.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.A purely metaphysical conception of God that lacks connection to these properties does not generate the expectation that evils would be eliminated.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.