Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that If God is the sole true cause, human agents cannot be genuinely responsible for their actions, collapsing moral accountability into divine determinism.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Divine foreknowledge of human choices need not cause those choices; God knowing what you'll freely choose doesn't make it unfree.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Responsibility requires acting on one's own desires and reasoning, which humans do even if God sustains existence—divine and human causation can coexist.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
The argument conflates metaphysical dependence on God with causal determination by God; these are distinct concepts requiring separate justification.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
If God is omniscient, God knows all future actions before humans perform them, making those actions predetermined rather than free.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Genuine moral responsibility requires the ability to have done otherwise; predetermined actions eliminate this capacity.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
If all causation ultimately traces to God's will, human agents are instruments of divine intention, not independent moral agents.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.