Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that If God's certainty derives from self-knowledge of infallibility rather than direct acquaintance with the future act, the act's freedom is undermined because its occurrence is explanatorily posterior to God's certain belief.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Explanatory order doesn't entail causal determination. God's certain belief can be grounded in His nature while the act remains free if causation doesn't transmit between them.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The agent's own deliberative process, not God's belief about it, is what determines whether an act is free. God's certainty can supervene on the agent's free choice without undermining it.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.If God is outside time, temporal explanatory priority is inapplicable. God's knowledge and human freedom operate in logically distinct frameworks that need not conflict.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.If God's belief about an act is grounded in His nature rather than the act's actual occurrence, the act's truth-value depends on what God necessarily is, not on free choice.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Explanatory priority matters for freedom: what grounds a fact constrains what could have been otherwise. If God's certainty grounds the act's occurrence, freedom is illusory.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Self-knowledge of infallibility cannot constitute knowledge of a contingent future act without that act already being metaphysically fixed by God's immutable nature.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.