If God's entry into time is grounded solely in an extrinsic relational change, the distinction between 'timeless without creation' and 'temporal with creation' collapses into a merely linguistic difference.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

Extrinsic relational change(as used in metaphysics and philosophy of time): A change that happens not because something's internal properties shift, but only because its relationship to something else shifts—like how a book becomes 'to the left of' a lamp only if the lamp moves, not because the book itself changed.
God's entry into time(as used in philosophy of religion and theology): The idea that God, who might exist outside of time, somehow becomes part of time (starts experiencing past, present, and future like we do) when creation happens.
Grounded(as used in metaphysics): Based on or explained by something; if something is 'grounded in' another thing, that second thing is the reason or foundation for the first.
Merely linguistic difference(as used in logic and language philosophy): A difference that exists only in the words we use to describe something, not in the actual reality itself—just different labels for the same thing.

Based on where you are in your exploration