If God's 'foreknowledge' is not genuinely prior in time to your act, then the inference from the necessity of the past to the necessity of your act has no temporal past to be fixed.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

Foreknowledge(Boethius's distinction between knowing and foreknowing): Knowledge of future events prior to their occurrence, distinguished from mere knowledge in that it implies temporal priority and thus raises the question of whether the future is already fixed
Necessity of your act(used to discuss whether human beings have free choice or whether their actions are determined): The claim that your action had to happen—that you couldn't have chosen or acted differently.
Prior in time(used to ask whether God's knowledge comes before or at the same moment as human actions): Happening or existing before something else in a sequence of moments.
inference(Nyāya epistemology): A component of epistemology in Nyāya philosophy; a veritable inference yields knowledge about the world and must have premises that are themselves known

Based on where you are in your exploration