If God timelessly knows proposition P, then God's knowing P is not earlier, later, or simultaneous with any human act, making it conceptually impossible for God's knowledge to be counterfactually dependent on what agents freely do.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

1 reason for

1 reason against

Reasons For

1 perspective

Reason for

1 perspective

Reason against

Based on where you are in your exploration

Conceptually impossible(as describing how akrasia would be if knowledge and action were unified): Something that couldn't even exist as an idea or concept—it would be logically contradictory to imagine it.
Counterfactually dependent(used to describe the relationship between God's belief and human choice): When one thing relies on what would have happened in an imaginary situation that didn't actually occur—like saying 'my grade depends on what would have happened if I'd studied harder.'
Free will (or freely do)(referring to human capacity for choice and action): The ability to make genuine choices that aren't forced or completely determined by outside forces or God's plan.
Timelessness (or God's timelessness)(describing God's relationship to knowledge and time): The idea that God exists outside of time entirely, rather than moving through past, present, and future like humans do.
knowledge(Distinguished from mere true belief, which may be the product of indoctrination and need not exercise deliberative capacities.): Justified true belief — true belief that has been arrived at through the exercise of deliberative capacities, including comparison of and deliberation among alternatives.
proposition(Used in the context of a semantic theory sensitive to differences in subject matter.): The content expressed by a sentence, individuated at least in part by the subject matter of the sentence and the contents of its subsentential expressions.

1 topic