Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that If ideas are intrinsic modifications of the perceiving mind, there is no warrant to locate them in a divine intellect external to the human perceiver.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Universal mathematical truths remain constant across observers; this stability suggests a mind-independent source, possibly divine.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Human minds sometimes fail to grasp ideas (e.g., errors, forgetting); this incompleteness suggests ideas exist independently of individual perception.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
The origin of ideas in finite minds requires explanation; a divine intellect as source doesn't contradict their intrinsic modification within us.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Ideas exist only where they are experienced; if perceived only in human minds, positing them elsewhere violates parsimony.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Intrinsic modifications are properties dependent on the substance modified; mind-dependent ideas cannot simultaneously inhere in a different substance.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Attributing ideas to a divine intellect requires independent justification beyond explaining human perception itself.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.