Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    If knowledge is only valuable because it produces pleasur... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Monist theories can be pluralist at the level of ordinary choice by positing intermediate values that derive their worth from a single foundational value

    If knowledge is only valuable because it produces pleasure, then knowledge-without-pleasure has zero value, which contradicts strong intuitions defended by G.E. Moore in Principia Ethica.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    G.E. Moore(as the creator of the Open Question Argument)
    A highly influential British philosopher (1873-1958) who developed important ideas about how we know things and what words actually mean.
    Intuitions (in philosophy)(the instinctive beliefs being evaluated)
    Gut-level beliefs or judgments that seem obviously true to us without needing proof, like how it intuitively feels wrong to hurt innocent people.
    Principia Ethica(the specific work being discussed)
    Moore's most famous book (published 1903) that laid out his ideas about what makes things good or bad.
    contradicts(as used in logic)
    Directly goes against or disagrees with something—like saying two opposite things can't both be true at the same time.
    intrinsic value

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    (Callicott (1980) in contrast to individualistic environmental ethics)
    Value possessed in and of itself, not derived from contribution to something else; in Callicott's holism, attributed exclusively to the biotic community as a whole rather than to individual organisms
    knowledge(Distinguished from mere true belief, which may be the product of indoctrination and need not exercise deliberative capacities.)
    Justified true belief — true belief that has been arrived at through the exercise of deliberative capacities, including comparison of and deliberation among alternatives.

    Connections

    1 topic

    Consequentialism1 linked

    Related

    Monist theories can be pluralist at the level of ordinary choice by positing int...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective