If mind exploits quantum indeterminacy to select among physically equiprobable outcomes, it redirects rather than injects energy, yet still guides physical causation non-physically.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

Non-physical causation(describes how the mind might guide physical events): When something immaterial (like a thought or mind) causes something physical to happen, without being made of matter itself.
Physical causation(contrasted with moral causation in the statement): The way physical objects and forces cause other things to happen according to the laws of nature—like how gravity makes a ball fall or how neurons firing in your brain causes your muscles to contract.
Physically equiprobable outcomes(what the mind supposedly selects from): Different possible results that have an equal chance of happening according to the laws of physics.
Quantum indeterminacy(as another argument Pereboom uses): The scientific idea from quantum physics that some events at the smallest scales are truly random and unpredictable, not predetermined.

Based on where you are in your exploration