Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Interactionism conflicts with basic principles of physica... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Consciousness & Mind
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Interactionism conflicts with basic principles of physical science

    CausationConsciousness & Mind
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    2 reasons for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    2 perspectives
    Reason for 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Pauli and Bohr's quantum-mechanical indeterminacy permits causal gaps in physical processes where no energy-conserving physical cause is mandated.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If mind exploits quantum indeterminacy to select among physically equiprobable outcomes, it redirects rather than injects energy, yet still guides physical causation non-physically.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Even redirection of physical causation by a non-physical agent constitutes causal influence outside standard physical-causal closure, conflicting with physicalist scientific methodology.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason for 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Neuroscientific studies of voluntary action (Libet et al.) show mental events initiating physical causal chains without identifiable prior physical causes.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If mental causation originates physical causal chains ex nihilo, energy enters the physical system from outside, violating conservation laws.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Conservation of energy is a fundamental scientific law
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If causal power flowed in and out of the physical system, energy would not be conserved
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Topics

    Consciousness & MindCausation

    Related

    Conservation of energy is a fundamental scientific lawEven redirection of physical causation by a non-physical agent constitutes causa...If causal power flowed in and out of the physical system, energy would not be co...If mental causation originates physical causal chains ex nihilo, energy enters t...
    +3 moreShow less
    If mind exploits quantum indeterminacy to select among physically equiprobable o...Neuroscientific studies of voluntary action (Libet et al.) show mental events in...Pauli and Bohr's quantum-mechanical indeterminacy permits causal gaps in physica...

    Similar

    McDowell's reasoning has failed to distinguish constitutive principles...75%Supervenience physicalism does not entail fundamentality physicalism.74%Panpsychism per se is not inconsistent with physicalism.74%A principle that relies on an incoherent conception should not be inco...73%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: dualism
    View source passageHide passage
    Even if there is no objection in principle, there appears to be a conflict between interactionism and some basic principles of physical science. For example, if causal power was flowing in and out of the physical system, energy would not be conserved, and the conservation of energy is a fundamental scientific law. Various responses have been made to this. One suggestion is that it might be possible for mind to influence the distribution of energy, without altering its quantity. (See Averill and
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    3 (2 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit