Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    If moral principles require transcendental deduction (as ... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→The Kantian argument against moral knowledge from experience is at best inconclusive

    If moral principles require transcendental deduction (as Kant concedes in Groundwork III), their authority cannot be established independently of some experiential anchoring in rational agency.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Experiential anchoring(as what moral principles need to depend on)
    Connecting something abstract (like a moral rule) to actual human experience so it has real-world meaning and relevance.
    Groundwork III(as the specific work being cited)
    The third section of Kant's book 'Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals,' where he tackles the hardest question: how do we actually know that our moral rules apply to us?
    Kant(as used in epistemology and metaphysics)
    Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) was an influential German philosopher who argued that our minds shape how we experience reality, and that we can only truly know things as they appear to us, not as they are in themselves.
    Transcendental Deduction(The Critique of Pure Reason; the deduction spans multiple sections and is not complete at §20)
    Kant's argument establishing the legitimate application of the pure concepts of the understanding (categories) to objects of experience

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    authority(as another method a physician might use to ensure patients comply with treatment)
    The power or right to make decisions and have others follow them, based on expertise or position. A doctor has authority because of their medical knowledge.
    independently(Used to argue that moral truths are not grounded in God but are presupposed by any meaningful predication of divine attributes)
    Existing prior to and apart from God's will or nature, such that moral and logical standards are not constituted by divine decree
    moral principles(Used to explain how moral judgement is epistemologically possible.)
    Regularities connecting the non-moral features of actions to their moral properties (rightness or wrongness).
    rational agency(Kantian account of autonomy)
    A mode of operation that can only function by seeking to be the first cause of its actions.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge1 linkedSkepticism1 linked

    Related

    The Kantian argument against moral knowledge from experience is at best inconclu...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective