Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    The Kantian argument against moral knowledge from experie... — Carmelics
    Home/Skepticism
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    The Kantian argument against moral knowledge from experience is at best inconclusive

    Skepticism
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    2 reasons for
    1 reason against

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Reasons For

    2 perspectives
    Reason for 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Kant's own critical philosophy acknowledges that synthetic a priori claims require transcendental justification, not mere stipulation of non-empirical origin.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If moral principles require transcendental deduction (as Kant concedes in Groundwork III), their authority cannot be established independently of some experiential anchoring in rational agency.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Therefore, the Kantian argument presupposes rather than proves the impossibility of empirically grounded moral knowledge, rendering it circular and inconclusive.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason for 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Rawls's reflective equilibrium method demonstrates a coherentist pathway to moral knowledge that begins with considered judgments—paradigm cases drawn from experience—without assuming foundational a priori principles.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If reflective equilibrium can yield justified moral beliefs by systematizing experiential moral data, then experience is a legitimate epistemic source for moral knowledge, undercutting the Kantian exclusion.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.The Kantian argument assumes that reasoning from experience must begin with clear cases of knowledge
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.An alternative conception of empirical reasoning exists in which general hypotheses explain experience and we reason by inferring the best explanation of our data
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.This alternative conception does not require starting points to be cases of moral knowledge
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Topics

    SkepticismTruth & Knowledge

    Key Terms

    knowledge(Distinguished from mere true belief, which may be the product of indoctrination and need not exercise deliberative capacities.)
    Justified true belief — true belief that has been arrived at through the exercise of deliberative capacities, including comparison of and deliberation among alternatives.

    Related

    An alternative conception of empirical reasoning exists in which general hypothe...If moral principles require transcendental deduction (as Kant concedes in Ground...If reflective equilibrium can yield justified moral beliefs by systematizing exp...Kant's own critical philosophy acknowledges that synthetic a priori claims requi...
    +6 moreShow less
    Nothing in the alternative conception of reasoning from experience necessitates ...Rawls's reflective equilibrium method demonstrates a coherentist pathway to mora...The Kantian argument assumes that reasoning from experience must begin with clea...Therefore, the Kantian argument presupposes rather than proves the impossibility...This alternative conception does not require starting points to be cases of mora...Unless the alternative conception can be eliminated, the Kantian argument fails ...

    Similar

    Nothing in the alternative conception of reasoning from experience nec...84%Kant's argument against experiential moral knowledge does not require ...83%Non-theistic accounts of how moral knowledge is possible face real que...82%The debunking argument assumes moral beliefs are not about moral prope...82%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: moral-epistemology
    View source passageHide passage
    A difficulty for the argument, however, is that it turns on a narrow conception of reasoning from experience. The argument assumes that reasoning from experience must begin with clear cases of knowledge, at least regarding the things observed in experience, and then infer more general knowledge. This way of thinking about empirical reasoning has a long tradition and was dominant among empiricist philosophers in the first half of the twentieth century. In the second half, thinking about reasoning
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    3 (2 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit