Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that If non-human free agents are responsible for natural evil, then the free will defense applies to the full range of evils, not merely moral evil produced by humans.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Non-human agents (demons, angels) are typically understood as having different metaphysical properties than humans, so identical defenses may not apply.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.An omnipotent creator could prevent non-human agents from causing evil while preserving their freedom in ways impossible for human moral development.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The empirical basis of the free will defense rests on human moral agency; extending it to hypothetical non-human agents lacks grounding in observable reality.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.If free will is genuinely valuable, it must extend to all agents capable of choice, including non-human entities, without arbitrary limitation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The free will defense's logical structure applies universally: any agent with libertarian freedom can produce evil as a necessary consequence of that freedom.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Restricting free will defense only to humans while positing non-human free agents creates an ad hoc inconsistency in theodicy.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.