Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    If our cognitive limitations prevent us from assigning pr... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→A defense against the problem of evil does not require a story that can be shown to be likely true; it only requires a story that, for all we know, is not unlikely.

    If our cognitive limitations prevent us from assigning probabilities to defensive stories, those same limitations equally prevent us from asserting the stories are 'not unlikely', making the asymmetric epistemic privilege claimed by the defense illegitimate.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Assign probabilities(as used in logic and reasoning)
    To estimate how likely something is to be true or happen, usually expressed as a percentage or number between 0 and 1.
    Defensive stories(as used in argumentation)
    Narratives or explanations created to protect or justify a particular position or belief against criticism.
    asymmetric(as used in logic and epistemology)
    When two things are treated differently or unequally, rather than being balanced or fair—like giving one side of an argument more weight than the other.
    cognitive limitations(as referring to human mental constraints)
    Boundaries on what our brains can do or understand—like how we can't process infinitely complex information or make perfect distinctions between very similar things.
    epistemic privilege

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    (Used to characterize the unwarranted assumption underlying IBE)
    A special predisposition or capacity on the part of human inquirers to reliably hit upon the absolutely best explanation when surveying possible explanations of data.
    epistemology(Contrasted with purely descriptive scientific inquiry)
    A normative enterprise that tells us how we ought to reason from evidence and how we ought to justify our beliefs, as distinct from merely describing how we do reason or justify beliefs
    illegitimate(as used in political philosophy)
    Not valid, justified, or acceptable according to proper rules or principles; lacking authority or rightful power.

    Connections

    1 topic

    Problem of Evil1 linked

    Related

    A defense against the problem of evil does not require a story that can be shown...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective