Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    If phenomenal knowledge is reducible to the acquisition o... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Facts about conscious experience cannot be fully understood from a third-person objective point of view

    If phenomenal knowledge is reducible to the acquisition of abilities rather than new facts, then all facts about conscious experience are already capturable within a complete third-person physical description.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Abilities(philosophy of mind)
    Skills or capacities you gain—for example, learning to recognize the difference between two colors gives you the ability to distinguish them.
    Phenomenal knowledge(epistemology (theory of knowledge))
    Knowledge about what it's like to experience something—like what it feels like to taste chocolate or see the color red—based on actually experiencing it yourself.
    Reducible(as used in metaphysics and philosophy of mind)
    Able to be broken down or explained in terms of something simpler or more basic; for example, saying 'water' is reducible to hydrogen and oxygen.
    The hard problem of consciousness(the underlying debate this statement addresses)
    The philosophical puzzle of why physical processes in the brain create subjective experience—why seeing red feels like something from the inside, not just a chemical reaction.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    Third-person physical description(philosophy of mind)
    A complete scientific account of something described from an outside, objective perspective using only measurable, physical information—like describing brain activity without mentioning what it feels like to experience something.
    facts(Used as relata in form (1) of the correspondence theory)
    States of affairs that obtain; unlike states of affairs in general, facts cannot serve as meanings of false sentences without absurd consequences
    knowledge(Distinguished from mere true belief, which may be the product of indoctrination and need not exercise deliberative capacities.)
    Justified true belief — true belief that has been arrived at through the exercise of deliberative capacities, including comparison of and deliberation among alternatives.

    Connections

    1 topic

    Consciousness & Mind1 linked

    Related

    Facts about conscious experience cannot be fully understood from a third-person ...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective