Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that If presentism is true, then any genuine occurrence must be locatable at some temporal B-series position, collapsing A-occurrence into B-occurrence.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
A-series properties constitute the essential phenomenology of temporal experience; collapsing them loses something real about becoming.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
B-series positions are relational and comparative; they cannot alone explain why events occur *now* rather than merely their eternal relations.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Presentism's denial of past/future may preserve A-properties as fundamental, making the collapse unjustified rather than entailed.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Presentism denies the reality of past and future; only the present exists with determinate properties.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
B-series positions (earlier/later relations) are the only objective temporal framework available to locate events.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
A-series properties (pastness, presentness, futurity) are mind-dependent or lack causal efficacy; genuine occurrences require B-series locatability.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.