If procedural and epistemic criteria suffice for legitimacy in global governance, the legitimacy 'problem' is not categorically different from domestic bureaucratic legitimacy questions.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

Bureaucratic legitimacy(as used in political philosophy): The question of whether government offices and organizations that handle day-to-day administration have the right to their power and make fair decisions.
Categorically different(arguing that weak dominance is not a weaker version of strong dominance, but something entirely separate): Fundamentally different in kind or type, rather than just different in degree or strength—like how a dog differs from a rock, not just like how a large dog differs from a small one.
Epistemic criteria(as the missing tool needed to decide between theories): Standards based on what we can know or believe—like how reliable something is or how well it helps us understand the world.
Global governance(as used in political philosophy): Systems and institutions that make decisions affecting the whole world or multiple countries, like the United Nations or international courts.

Based on where you are in your exploration