Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    If relations of origin suffice to individuate Persons wit... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The three Persons of the Trinity must be three distinct particular divine substances for the concept of consubstantiality to be coherent

    If relations of origin suffice to individuate Persons within one numerically identical substance, the claim that distinct particular substances are required for coherent consubstantiality is defeated.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Relations of origin (e.g., procession) successfully individuate the three persons within the Christian Trinity despite numerical substance identity.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If internal relational distinctions suffice for personhood within one substance, separate substances become metaphysically redundant and violate parsimony.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Consubstantiality requires only shared essential nature, not numerically distinct substrates; relational individuation is compatible with this requirement.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Relations of origin may individuate persons but do not constitute the metaphysical basis for their subsistence as distinct particulars within substance.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Distinct particular substances provide irreducible ontological grounding that relational properties alone cannot supply for genuine consubstantiality.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Assuming relations suffice risks collapsing personhood into mere modal or accidental distinctions, undermining substantive claims about divine persons.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Key Terms

    Individuate(metaphysics)
    To identify or distinguish something as a separate, individual thing with its own unique identity.
    Numerically identical(as used to describe whether two agents are the exact same person)
    Being literally the same thing, not just similar or alike—like how the person you are today is numerically identical to the person you were yesterday (one and the same individual).
    Particular substances(examples of what Aristotle studied in metaphysics)
    Individual, concrete things that exist in the world—like a specific cat, dog, or person. They're 'particular' because they're one specific thing rather than a general category.
    consubstantiality(Trinitarian theology; Nicene formula)
    The property of sharing the same substance or nature. Philoponus argues that consubstantiality only makes sense if applied to three distinct particular substances that each instantiate a shared universal nature
    persons(Metaphysical units in reductionism)
    Psychological units constituted by psychological continuity over time, serving as the basic moral units under Parfit's Moderate Claim.
    relations of origin(metaphysics/theology)
    The connections between things based on where they come from or how they were created; in this case, who or what caused a person to exist.
    substance(Spinoza's metaphysics; criteria include (i) necessity and (ii) self-subsistence)
    The fundamental existent that is wholly necessary and self-subsistent, not depending on anything else for its existence

    Connections

    2 topics

    Trinity1 linkedDivine Attributes1 linked

    Related

    Assuming relations suffice risks collapsing personhood into mere modal or accide...Consubstantiality requires only shared essential nature, not numerically distinc...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit
    Distinct particular substances provide irreducible ontological grounding that re...
    If internal relational distinctions suffice for personhood within one substance,...
    +3 moreShow less
    Relations of origin (e.g., procession) successfully individuate the three person...Relations of origin may individuate persons but do not constitute the metaphysic...The three Persons of the Trinity must be three distinct particular divine substa...