Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    If the antecedent premise 'art is defined in terms of aes... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→If art is defined in terms of aesthetic experience, then conceptual art cannot be considered a kind of art.

    If the antecedent premise 'art is defined in terms of aesthetic experience' is false, the conditional claim yields no sound conclusion about conceptual art's status.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Conditionals with false antecedents are vacuously true but epistemically uninformative about their consequents.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If aesthetic experience doesn't define art, then drawing conclusions about conceptual art from that definition is logically unfounded.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Sound reasoning requires true premises; a false antecedent undermines the argument's ability to establish conclusions.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.The claim conflates logical vacuity with epistemic uselessness; false antecedents can still illuminate conceptual relationships.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Conceptual art's status might be determinable through other philosophical definitions (institutional, intentional) without relying on aesthetic definitions.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.A conditional can yield meaningful conclusions about what follows IF the antecedent were true, even when antecedent is false.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    1 topic

    Aesthetics1 linked

    Related

    A conditional can yield meaningful conclusions about what follows IF the anteced...Conceptual art's status might be determinable through other philosophical defini...Conditionals with false antecedents are vacuously true but epistemically uninfor...If aesthetic experience doesn't define art, then drawing conclusions about conce...
    +3 moreShow less
    If art is defined in terms of aesthetic experience, then conceptual art cannot b...Sound reasoning requires true premises; a false antecedent undermines the argume...The claim conflates logical vacuity with epistemic uselessness; false antecedent...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit