Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that If the antecedent premise 'art is defined in terms of aesthetic experience' is false, the conditional claim yields no sound conclusion about conceptual art's status.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.The claim conflates logical vacuity with epistemic uselessness; false antecedents can still illuminate conceptual relationships.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Conceptual art's status might be determinable through other philosophical definitions (institutional, intentional) without relying on aesthetic definitions.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.A conditional can yield meaningful conclusions about what follows IF the antecedent were true, even when antecedent is false.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Conditionals with false antecedents are vacuously true but epistemically uninformative about their consequents.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If aesthetic experience doesn't define art, then drawing conclusions about conceptual art from that definition is logically unfounded.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Sound reasoning requires true premises; a false antecedent undermines the argument's ability to establish conclusions.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.