Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    If the conditioning proposition A entails E, then being g... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Truth & Knowledge
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→The conditional credence Cr(E | A) should be 1 when A is the conjunction of 'the coin is fair' and E, rather than the 0.5 chance of E

    If the conditioning proposition A entails E, then being given A is being given information that guarantees E

    Truth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Truth & Knowledge

    Related

    The conditional credence Cr(E | A) should be 1 when A is the conjunction of 'the...When a conditioning proposition entails the event E, the conditional credence in...

    Similar

    Bayesian conditioning is the probabilistic counterpart of logical publ...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Truth & Knowledge
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    82%
    When a conditioning proposition entails the event E, the conditional c...81%
    A conditioning proposition B with probability zero cannot be handled d...75%
    Bayesian confirmation requires that evidence proposition E raises the ...74%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: epistemology-bayesian
    View source passageHide passage
    The if-clause refers to “admissible” propositions, which are roughly propositions that give no more information about whether or not \(E\) is true than is already contained in \(\Ch(E) = c\). To see why we need the qualification imposed by the if-clause, suppose for instance that the event \(E\) is “the coin will land heads the next time it is tossed”. If the conditioning proposition \(A\) is “the coin is fair”, it is a paradigmatic example of an “ordinary” proposition. This reproduces the Coin

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective