Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    If 'the fact that snow is white' and 'the proposition tha... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→The identity theory of truth faces an objection based on the non-congruence of canonical names of propositions and facts.

    If 'the fact that snow is white' and 'the proposition that snow is white' were truly identical, substitution failures would be impossible—yet they systematically occur across modal and epistemic contexts.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Facts are abstract entities about the world; propositions are linguistic/mental representations. Different ontological categories cannot be identical.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.We can rationally doubt that 'snow is white' is true while not doubting the fact that snow is white. This epistemic asymmetry indicates non-identity.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Facts don't require language; propositions do. Identity requires all properties to be shared, so distinct property-possession means non-identity.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Substitution failures occur because modal/epistemic operators create opaque contexts, not because facts and propositions differ. Same entity, different contexts.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The argument confuses metaphysical identity with epistemic accessibility. We might fail to recognize identicals under certain conceptual frameworks without denying identity.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.If facts and propositions are genuinely distinct, we need criteria explaining what makes a proposition correspond to a fact—a harder problem than identity itself.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Key Terms

    Modal contexts(as used in logic and metaphysics)
    Situations in sentences where you're talking about possibility, necessity, or what could/must/might happen (as opposed to just stating plain facts).
    Substitution failures(as a problem these filters are meant to solve)
    Cases where you can't swap one phrase for another phrase that seems equivalent without changing the truth or meaning of a sentence.
    epistemic contexts(as used in epistemology (the study of knowledge))
    The situations or settings in which we're trying to know something—like whether the standards for what counts as 'knowing' something change depending on the circumstances.
    fact(Armstrong/Mellor's account of facts as truth-makers)
    A fundamental entity consisting in objects, properties and relations bound together, posited to serve as truth-maker for contingent atomic predications
    identical(whether the concept of 'human' and the concept of 'animal' are the same)
    Exactly the same as something else, not just similar but truly one and the same thing.
    proposition(Used in the context of a semantic theory sensitive to differences in subject matter.)
    The content expressed by a sentence, individuated at least in part by the subject matter of the sentence and the contents of its subsentential expressions.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge1 linkedPhilosophy of Language1 linked

    Related

    Facts are abstract entities about the world; propositions are linguistic/mental ...Facts don't require language; propositions do. Identity requires all properties ...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit
    If facts and propositions are genuinely distinct, we need criteria explaining wh...
    Substitution failures occur because modal/epistemic operators create opaque cont...
    +3 moreShow less
    The argument confuses metaphysical identity with epistemic accessibility. We mig...The identity theory of truth faces an objection based on the non-congruence of c...We can rationally doubt that 'snow is white' is true while not doubting the fact...