Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    If the head of the civil state violates the obligation to... — Carmelics
    Home/Justice & Punishment
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→A ruler can hold authority even when that authority ceases to be legitimate.

    If the head of the civil state violates the obligation to enact only laws to which all individuals could consent, the authority becomes illegitimate.

    Justice & PunishmentSocial Contract
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Justice & PunishmentSocial Contract

    Connections

    1 topic

    Democracy & Governance3 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Justice & Punishment
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    A ruler can hold authority even when that authority ceases to be legitimate.Kant distinguishes between legitimate authority and effective authority.Yet the head of state still holds authority despite this violation.

    Similar

    Without citizens being bound by public law, there cannot be a civil st...78%Yet the head of state still holds authority despite this violation.77%Tacit consent to a government creates an obligation to obey the laws o...76%No state possesses legitimate political authority over the individual.75%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: legitimacy
    View source passageHide passage
    Kant, unlike Hobbes, recognizes the difference between legitimate and effective authority. For the head of the civil state is under an obligation to obey public reason and to enact only laws to which all individuals could consent. If he violates this obligation, however, he still holds authority, even if his authority ceases to be legitimate. This view is best explained in relation to Kant’s often criticized position on the right to revolution. Kant famously denied that there is a right to revol

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective