Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    If the knives had not been gifted, the coincidental fall ... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→When coincidences intervene in a causal chain, earlier acts in that chain are not considered proximate causes of the resulting harm.

    If the knives had not been gifted, the coincidental fall would have produced no knife-related death, making the gift a necessary condition for the harm.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Necessary conditions are those without which an outcome cannot occur; no knives present means no knife-related death possible.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The gift created the causal pathway enabling harm; absent the gift, the fall's outcome differs fundamentally in kind.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Moral responsibility tracks necessary conditions; givers bear responsibility when their act makes harm possible.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.The fall itself, not the knives, is the triggering cause; knives are merely one of infinite potential harm-enabling conditions.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Necessary condition ≠ culpable cause; oxygen is necessary for harm but givers of knives aren't responsible for oxygen.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Intervening human choices (how/whether to position knives) break causal chains; giver's necessity doesn't entail their liability.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    1 topic

    Consequentialism1 linked

    Related

    Intervening human choices (how/whether to position knives) break causal chains; ...Moral responsibility tracks necessary conditions; givers bear responsibility whe...Necessary condition ≠ culpable cause; oxygen is necessary for harm but givers of...Necessary conditions are those without which an outcome cannot occur; no knives ...
    +3 moreShow less
    The fall itself, not the knives, is the triggering cause; knives are merely one ...The gift created the causal pathway enabling harm; absent the gift, the fall's o...When coincidences intervene in a causal chain, earlier acts in that chain are no...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit