Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that If the knives had not been gifted, the coincidental fall would have produced no knife-related death, making the gift a necessary condition for the harm.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.The fall itself, not the knives, is the triggering cause; knives are merely one of infinite potential harm-enabling conditions.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Necessary condition ≠ culpable cause; oxygen is necessary for harm but givers of knives aren't responsible for oxygen.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Intervening human choices (how/whether to position knives) break causal chains; giver's necessity doesn't entail their liability.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Necessary conditions are those without which an outcome cannot occur; no knives present means no knife-related death possible.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The gift created the causal pathway enabling harm; absent the gift, the fall's outcome differs fundamentally in kind.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Moral responsibility tracks necessary conditions; givers bear responsibility when their act makes harm possible.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.