If the mere capacity for experience carries negative value (unavoidable pain, frustration, decline), then Nagel's premise that experience itself adds positive welfare weight is false.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

1 reason for

1 reason against

Reasons For

1 perspective

Reason for

1 perspective

Reason against

Based on where you are in your exploration

Nagel(as a key philosopher cited in this theory): Thomas Nagel is a famous American philosopher known for thinking deeply about consciousness, death, and what makes life meaningful.
Premise: A premise is a statement or fact that you assume to be true as a starting point for reasoning or making an argument. Think of it as the foundation or building block you use to reach a conclusion—for example, "All dogs are animals" and "My pet is a dog" are premises that lead to the conclusion "My pet is an animal." Premises are essentially the evidence or claims you offer before drawing a final conclusion.
capacity for experience(discussing what it means to be conscious): The ability to feel, perceive, and be aware of things—to have subjective sensations like pain, joy, or curiosity rather than just existing without feeling anything.
negative value(evaluating whether something is good or bad): Something that makes a situation worse or counts against overall well-being; the opposite of positive value. Pain has negative value because it's bad to experience it.
welfare(Critique of Stein's strict health-welfare correlation): A subjective notion of well-being that is affected by multiple domains, not health alone.

1 topic