Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that If the non-damned could become just as thankful through annihilation, God could cause the same good by causing less pain
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Annihilation may not produce gratitude at all—non-existent beings cannot experience anything, including thankfulness, by definition.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Gratitude arising from conscious existence and growth through adversity may be categorically different from (and superior to) non-existence.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
We cannot know whether God's actual creation maximizes total good; our intuitions about efficiency across metaphysical domains are unreliable.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Gratitude requires only a comparative awareness of relief from non-existence; annihilation provides this without ongoing suffering.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
An omnipotent being can achieve any good outcome through multiple means; choosing the path with less suffering is morally superior.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
The existence of actual pain in our world suggests God permits suffering beyond what's necessary for gratitude or spiritual goods.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.