Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    If the self were the locus of control, it could never exe... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Consciousness & Mind
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→A self that is the locus of complete control over itself cannot exist as a distinct entity within the psychophysical elements.

    If the self were the locus of control, it could never exercise control over itself due to the irreflexivity principle.

    Consciousness & MindFree Will & Foreknowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Consciousness & MindFree Will & Foreknowledge

    Connections

    1 topic

    Personal Identity2 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Consciousness & Mind
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    A self that is the locus of complete control over itself cannot exist as a disti...The person is wholly composed of psychophysical elements.There is no bodily or psychological state over which one might not wish to exerc...

    Similar

    The irreflexivity principle implies that the self, if it were the locu...94%If the self is the controller, it falls under the irreflexivity princi...89%A self that is the locus of complete control over itself cannot exist ...84%Self-control requires the higher, reasonable aspect of oneself to dete...75%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: buddha
    View source passageHide passage
    Premise (1) is puzzling. It appears to presuppose that the self should have complete control over itself, so that it would effortlessly adjust its state to its desires. That the self should be thought of as the locus of control is certainly plausible. Those Indian self-theorists who claim that the self is a mere passive witness recognize that the burden of proof is on them to show that the self is not an agent. But it seems implausibly demanding to require of the self that it have complete contr

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective