Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    If the statistical generalization is causally traceable t... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Employers are legally prohibited from making hiring decisions based on statistical generalizations about protected groups, even when those generalizations are statistically sound.

    If the statistical generalization is causally traceable to prior structural injustice, the wrong lies in the structural conditions, not the employer's inference from them—Lippert-Rasmussen's causal argument.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Employers using statistically accurate generalizations rooted in past injustice are instrumentalizing victims rather than perpetuating the original wrong.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Moral responsibility should track causal responsibility: structural injustice causes disparities, so fixing structures—not policing inferences—addresses root wrongs.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Holding employers liable for using accurate statistics incentivizes denial of structural problems rather than systemic reform.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Statistical discrimination harms individuals in the present regardless of its historical origins; past causation doesn't eliminate current wrongful treatment.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Employers have independent agency in choosing discrimination; attributing their choice entirely to prior structures obscures their own causal role.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Victims cannot wait for structural reform while facing present discrimination; holding employers accountable creates immediate incentive to stop harmful practices.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Key Terms

    Causal argument(Lippert-Rasmussen's method of assigning blame and responsibility)
    A type of reasoning that explains why something happened by tracing what caused it, rather than just describing what happened.
    Causally traceable(as used in arguments about responsibility and origin of wealth)
    Able to be directly connected to a specific cause; you can draw a clear line showing how one thing directly caused another.
    Lippert-Rasmussen(the statement references his specific argument about causal responsibility)
    A contemporary philosopher who studies fairness and discrimination, particularly how unfair systems create problems that go beyond individual bad choices.
    Statistical generalization(what an employer might do based on group data)
    Making a decision about someone based on average patterns in a group rather than facts about that specific person (like assuming someone is bad at math because of their gender).
    structural injustice(Powers and Faden 2019)
    A condition characterized by unfair patterns of disadvantage, unfair power relations, deprivations in core elements of well-being, and human rights violations, where these elements are mutually reinforcing.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Rights & Liberty1 linkedJustice & Punishment1 linked

    Related

    Employers are legally prohibited from making hiring decisions based on statistic...Employers have independent agency in choosing discrimination; attributing their ...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit
    Employers using statistically accurate generalizations rooted in past injustice ...
    Holding employers liable for using accurate statistics incentivizes denial of st...
    +3 moreShow less
    Moral responsibility should track causal responsibility: structural injustice ca...Statistical discrimination harms individuals in the present regardless of its hi...Victims cannot wait for structural reform while facing present discrimination; h...