If the truth-maker for a present belief about my future act is the act itself, then God's present foreknowledge is constitutively dependent on my act, undermining divine aseity and omniscience as traditionally conceived.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

Constitutively dependent(metaphysics): When something's very nature or existence depends on something else. Here, it means God's knowledge would literally be made by or built from your actions, rather than existing independently.
Divine aseity(philosophy of religion/theology): The idea that God is completely self-sufficient and independent—God doesn't need anything outside of God to exist or be God. 'Aseity' comes from Latin meaning 'from oneself.'
Foreknowledge(Boethius's distinction between knowing and foreknowing): Knowledge of future events prior to their occurrence, distinguished from mere knowledge in that it implies temporal priority and thus raises the question of whether the future is already fixed
knowledge(Distinguished from mere true belief, which may be the product of indoctrination and need not exercise deliberative capacities.): Justified true belief — true belief that has been arrived at through the exercise of deliberative capacities, including comparison of and deliberation among alternatives.

Based on where you are in your exploration