Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that If time originates with the world, there is no coherent temporal 'before' in which a creator could exist and act causally.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
A timeless agent can possess all causal powers simultaneously without temporal sequence. Timelessness doesn't negate agency itself.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Creation isn't a temporal event requiring prior time; it's the bringing-into-being of spacetime itself from logical/metaphysical necessity.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Incoherence of 'before time' doesn't eliminate causation—it shows temporal causation differs from atemporal metaphysical causation.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Causality requires temporal ordering: cause must precede effect. Without time, no 'before' exists for causal relations.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If time is part of the created world, asking what existed 'before' time is logically incoherent, like asking north of the North Pole.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
A creator acting causally requires duration between intention and action. Timelessness precludes such causal agency.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.