Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that If value can obtain independently of a experiencing subject, then life's continuation is not a logical precondition for the goods absurdism identifies.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Absurdism's goods are fundamentally about human experience—revolt and freedom are states only a subject can instantiate or appreciate.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If value obtained independently, we'd need an account of what 'obtaining' means without any ontological ground; this seems incoherent.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Camus defines the absurd through the confrontation between human need for meaning and the universe's silence—this requires an experiencing subject.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Mathematical truths and logical relationships exist independently of minds; value could similarly obtain as objective features of reality.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Absurdism's goods (freedom, passion, revolt) describe ways of engaging with meaning; these goods don't require life's continuation to be real.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
A single moment of authentic rebellion contains complete value; it need not extend temporally to possess worth independent of the subject's existence.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.